Model System:
SCIReference Type:
JAAccession No.:
Journal:
Spinal Cord
Year, Volume, Issue, Page(s):
, 46, 7, 500-506Publication Website:
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal direct observation of a constrained consensus-building process in nine consumer panels and three rehabilitation professional panels. OBJECTIVES: To illustrate differences among consumer and clinician preferences for the restoration of walking function based on severity of injury, time of injury and age of the individual. SETTING: Regional Spinal Cord Center in Philadelphia, USA. METHODS: Twelve panels (consumer and clinical) came to independent consensus using the features-resource trade-off game. The procedure involves trading imagined levels of independence (resources) across different functional items (features) at different stages of recovery. RESULTS: Walking is given priority early in the game by eight out of nine consumer panels and by two out of three professional panels. The exception consumer panel (ISCI
Author(s):
Ditunno, P. L., Patrick, M., Stineman, M., Ditunno, J. F.